Skip to main content
Audit

Movement archive · market facts

What the market did before July 24, 2026

Boxing and UFC5 bouts. Below is how each fight’s no-vig fair probability moved between its first and latest capture, with timestamps. These are market facts — what the prices did — not picks, not predictions, and no read on who won.

14 snapshots across 5 days (Jul 20 – Jul 24), 1–5 per day. Snapshots, not tick data — a price could move and settle between two captures and only the endpoints would be seen. Latest capture Jul 24, 18:00 UTC. “Fair” = the book’s margin removed; a truer implied chance, not a forecast.

Biggest market moves

UFCMarkus Perez vs Vanilto Antunes

Vanilto Antunes’s fair probability moved from 44.2% (Jul 23) to 76.2% (Jul 24) — a +31.9 pts shift. Price +110-400 across 1 book.

UFCDaniel Da Silva vs Andre Ewell

Andre Ewell’s fair probability moved from 44.2% (Jul 23) to 57.1% (Jul 24) — a +12.9 pts shift. Price +110-145 across 1 book.

UFCSam Alvey vs Uriah Hall

Sam Alvey’s fair probability moved from 29.3% (Jul 23) to 25.2% (Jul 24) — a -4.1 pts shift. Price +215+275 across 1 book.

UFCAline Pereira vs Juliana Velasquez

Aline Pereira’s fair probability moved from 64.3% (Jul 23) to 60.7% (Jul 24) — a -3.6 pts shift. Price -225-170 across 1 book.

Stable on this slate

These bouts barely moved (under 1.0 fair-prob point). Stated as a finding, not dressed up as movement.

  • Tyson Fury vs Mariusz Wach4.6% / 95.4% fair, 0.0 pts

Capture by capture — top 3 movers

Vanilto Antunes (Markus Perez vs Vanilto Antunes)

Jul 23

44.3%

+110 · 1bk

Jul 23

52.9%

-135 · 1bk

Jul 23

52.9%

-135 · 1bk

Jul 23

69.2%

-300 · 1bk

Jul 23

73.7%

-400 · 1bk

Jul 24

76.2%

-400 · 1bk

Jul 24

76.2%

-400 · 1bk

Jul 24

76.2%

-400 · 1bk

Jul 24

76.2%

-400 · 1bk

Jul 24

76.2%

-400 · 1bk

Andre Ewell (Daniel Da Silva vs Andre Ewell)

Jul 23

44.3%

+110 · 1bk

Jul 23

45.2%

+105 · 1bk

Jul 23

45.2%

+105 · 1bk

Jul 23

45.2%

+105 · 1bk

Jul 23

45.2%

+105 · 1bk

Jul 24

48.9%

-105 · 1bk

Jul 24

53.3%

-125 · 1bk

Jul 24

52.6%

-122 · 1bk

Jul 24

52.6%

-122 · 1bk

Jul 24

57.1%

-145 · 1bk

Sam Alvey (Sam Alvey vs Uriah Hall)

Jul 23

29.3%

+215 · 1bk

Jul 23

29.3%

+215 · 1bk

Jul 23

29.3%

+215 · 1bk

Jul 23

29.3%

+215 · 1bk

Jul 23

28.2%

+240 · 1bk

Jul 24

27.6%

+250 · 1bk

Jul 24

25.0%

+285 · 1bk

Jul 24

25.4%

+280 · 1bk

Jul 24

25.4%

+280 · 1bk

Jul 24

25.3%

+275 · 1bk

Full slate — every bout

Consensus no-vig fair probability at first vs latest capture. Bouts with a single capture show the current price only — no movement claim.

BoutFirstLatestFair ΔBooks
Markus Perez vs Vanilto AntunesUFC · Jul 2444.2%+110 · Jul 2376.2%-400 · Jul 24+31.9 pts1
Daniel Da Silva vs Andre EwellUFC · Jul 2444.2%+110 · Jul 2357.1%-145 · Jul 24+12.9 pts1
Sam Alvey vs Uriah HallUFC · Jul 2429.3%+215 · Jul 2325.2%+275 · Jul 24-4.1 pts1
Aline Pereira vs Juliana VelasquezUFC · Jul 2464.3%-225 · Jul 2360.7%-170 · Jul 24-3.6 pts1
Tyson Fury vs Mariusz WachBoxing · Jul 244.6%+2000 · Jul 204.6%+2000 · Jul 240.0 pts1

Showing the side that moved most per bout. 4 bout(s) moved ≥ 1.0 pt · 1 stable · 0 single-capture.

Methodology

  • Source. An archive of combat-sport prices (UFC + boxing) captured from multiple books over time. 14 snapshots across 5 days (Jul 20 – Jul 24), 1–5 per day. Snapshots, not tick data — a price could move and settle between two captures and only the endpoints would be seen.
  • Fair probability. Each book’s two-sided price has its margin removed (no-vig), then averaged across books in probability space — never by averaging the American prices. A movement figure needs a complete two-sided price at both captures; single-sided markets show the price only.
  • Movement. The change in that fair probability between a side’s first and latest capture, in percentage points. A bout with one capture makes no movement claim.
  • What this is not. Not a pick, not a prediction, no read on why a price moved, and no result — this page does not say who won. Prices move for many reasons; it reports only that they did, and when.

Related: all archived slates · no-vig calculator · parlay vig calculator.

For entertainment purposes only · 21+ · Only bet what you can afford to lose · 1-800-GAMBLER